Restorative materials

Voco Ionolux

2017

Summary

70% of the evaluators would purchase this resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material.

Rating

GCP Glass Fill glass carbomer restorative material

2017

Summary

62% of the evaluators would both purchase this material and recommend it to colleagues

Rating

SDI Aura Bulk Fill restorative material

2016

Summary

70% of the evaluators would purchase this bulk fill restorative material and 80% would recommend it to colleagues. 

Rating

3M ESPE Filtek Bulk Fill Restorative

2015

Summary

75% of the evaluators would purchase this bulk fill restorative material and 92% would recommend it to colleagues

Rating

Voco Rebilda Post system

2013

Summary

70% of the evaluators would purchase this system and 80% would recommend it to colleagues

Rating

SDI Riva LC resin-modified glass-ionomer

2012

Summary

60% of the evaluators would both purchase this material and recommend it to colleagues

Rating

Shofu Beautifil Flow Plus

2012

Summary

Full paper available on request. Two maximum scores were achieved by this material, which to date is unique for PREP Panel evaluations.

Rating

3M ESPE Protemp 4 Temporary C & B Material

2012

Summary

77% of the evaluators would purchase this material and 85% would recommend it to colleagues. Full published paper available on request

Rating

Dentsply ChemFil Rock

2011

Summary

73% of the evaluators would both purchase this glass-ionomer material and recommend it to colleagues.

Rating

Voco GrandioSo composite restorative

2011

Summary

73% of the evaluators would both purchase this material and recommend it to colleagues

Rating

3M ESPE Filtek Silorane low shrink composite

2010

Summary

The positive reception of this novel material is indicated by the 67% of evaluators who would purchase the Filtek Silorane system & that 73% would recommend the system to colleagues.

Rating

Dentsply SDR bulk fill restorative material

2010

Summary

75% of the evaluators would both purchase the material and recommend it to colleagues

Rating

3M ESPE Filtek Supreme XTE

2010

Summary

91% of the evaluators would purchase this nano-filled composite restorative material and also recommend it to colleagues

Rating

Septodont N’Durance and N’Durance Dimer Flow

2009

Summary

 80% of the evaluators stated they would both purchase the system and recommend it colleagues.

Rating

3M ESPE Clinpro White Varnish

2009

Summary

73% of the evaluators would purchase this material and 100% would recommend it to colleagues

Rating

Voco Xtra Fil Posterior Composite

2009

Summary

This simple technique single shade posterior composite restorative received good ratings and 69% of the evaluators would purchase the material if available at average cost.

Rating

Coltene Miris composite restorative

2007

Summary

83% of the evaluators were satisfied with Miris and its good reception is indicated by the 58% who would purchase the material at a full pack price of £240 & that 75% would recommend the system to colleagues.

Rating

Tokuyama Palifique Estelite composite restorative

2005

Summary

That 75% of the evaluators would purchase this composite restorative material indicates the positive reception of Palifique Estelite paste by the evaluators.

Rating

Voco Grandio universal nano-hybrid restorative

2004

Summary

The handling of Voco Grandio has been subjected to a rigorous practice-based assessment, and the positive reception is indicated by the 73% of evaluators who stated they would purchase Voco Grandio.

Rating

Voco Grandio Flow flowable restorative

2004

Summary

The material was very well received as indicated by the high number (91%) of evaluators who stated they would purchase Grandio Flow.

Rating

Dentsply Esthet X composite restorative

2003

Summary

That the material was well received is indicated by the 100% of evaluators who stated they would purchase the Esthet X system for £199 and that all the evaluators would recommend the system to colleagues. 

Rating

3M ESPE Filtek Supreme Composite restorative

2003

Summary

The positive reception of this nano-filled composite restorative material is indicated by the 100% of evaluators who stated they were satisfied with Filtek Supreme and that 83% of the evaluators would recommend the system to colleagues.

Rating

Voco Admira Flowable Composite - Ormocer®

2001

Summary

Clinical uses include Class V cavities, base under composites, PRR's. That the material was well received is reflected in the 78% (n=7) of the evaluators who stated that they would purchase the Admira Flow system if available at £60 for a full range of 6 shades.

Rating

ESPE Hytac compomer restorative

2000

Summary

69% of the evaluators would purchase the sytem if available at average cost

Rating

3M Dental F2000 Compomer

1998

Summary

70% of the evaluators would purchase this compomer material

Rating

Shofu Lite-Fil II

1994

Summary

66% of the evaluators considered Lite-FIl II to be superior to their current composite system

Rating

Luting

3M ESPE Scotchbond Universal adhesive

2013

Summary

All 100% of the evaluators would purchase this material

Rating

3M ESPE RelyX Ultimate

2011

Summary

83% of the evaluators would purchase the material and 75% would recommend it to colleagues

Rating

3M ESPE RelyX Unicem 2 Automix dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement

2010

Summary

90% of evaluators would both purchase the system and recommend it to colleagues

Rating

3M ESPE RelyX™ Unicem Clicker resin composite luting material

2006

Summary

The 81% of the evaluators would purchase the Clicker version of 3M ESPE’s popular resin-based luting material RelyX Unicem and the same number would recommend this product to colleagues.

Rating

Dentsply Calibra Resin composite luting material

2002

Summary

Calibra was rated slightly higher by the evaluators for ease of use compared with their normally used resin-based luting system. The positive reception of the material is shown by all the evaluators stating they would recommend the Calibra system to colleagues.

Rating

3M ESPE Unicem resin composite luting material

2002

Summary

The positive reception of this self-adhesive resin luting material is underlined by the fact that all the evaluators would purchase the material if available at average cost and also that again all 100% of the evaluators would recommend Unicem to colleagues.

Rating

Instruments

Dentsply Sirona Nupro White Varnish

2018

Summary

91% of the evaluators would purchase this fluoride varnish system

Rating

Kerr Demi-Ultra Light Curing Unit

2014

Summary

67% of the evalutors would purchase this light-curing unit and 60% would recommend it to colleagues

Rating

3M ESPE Astringent Retraction Paste

2014

Summary

75% of the evaljuators would purchase this capsulated retraction paste system 

Rating

Voco Rebilda Post System

2013

Summary

80% Of the evaluators woiuld purchase this post system

Rating

Ivoclar-Vivadent Optra Matrix

2006

Summary

The OptraMatrix system consists of 6 different thinned matrix bands for use with a Tofflemire matrix retainer. Full publication paper available on request

Rating

Ivoclar-Vivadent OptraContact

2006

Summary

OptraContact is a hand instrument to aid contact point formation in the placing of Class II composite restorations. Full publication paper available on request

Rating

Ivoclar-Vivadent OptraSculpt

2006

Summary

The OptraSculpt instrument & tip system consists of 2 stainless steel/plastic sterilisable instruments for use with 6 different disposable tips to model composite restorative materials before curing. Full publication paper available on request

Rating

Ansell No Powder Examination Gloves

1996

Summary

60% of the evaluators would purchase Ansell No Powder gloves if avalable at £54.00 per box.

Rating

Impressions

3M ESPE Astringent Retraction Paste

2012

Summary

75% of the evaluators would purchase this product and 83% would recommend it to colleagues

Rating

3M ESPE Pentamix 3 Auto-mix Impression machine

2010

Summary

85% of the evaluators would recommend this auto-mix machine to colleagues

Rating

Coltene Affinis Precious

2008

Summary

Evaluation scores were similar to the previously used impression material. Full paper available on request

Rating

3M Position Tray & Penta Quick Preliminary Impression Material

2005

Summary

64% of evaluators would bothe purchase the Position Tray set and the Position Penta Quick impression asystem

Rating

Coltene/Whaledent Affinis Vinyl Polysiloxane Impression Material

2004

Summary

A very well received impression system. 82% of the evaluators wold recommend the Affinis impression system to their colleagues.

Rating

Heraeus Kulzer P2 Polyether Impression Material

2004

Summary

45% of the evaluators stated they would recommend the P2 polyether impression system to their colleagues. This indicates how well this impression system has been received but also the difficulty in persuading clinicians to change from tried and trusted impression systems for similar end results

Rating

Zhermack Elite Elastomeric Impression Material

1994

Summary

67% of the evaluators considered the material performed well in areas where there was limited moisture

Rating

Bonding

3M ESPE Scotchbond Universal

2014

Summary

All 100% of the evaluators would purcahse this bonding system

Rating

GC G-Aenial

2013

Summary

67% of the evaluators would purchase GC G-Aenial Bond

Rating

Shofu Beautibond

2012

Summary

All 100% of the evaluators would purchase this product, with maximum scores achieved for ease of use and handling.

Rating

3M ESPE RelyX Unicem Clicker

2009

Summary

81% of the evaluators would both purchase the material and recommend it to colleagues.Full paper available on request

Rating

Coltene Whaledent One Coat Bond

2007

Summary

45% of the evaluators would purchase this self-etching Bonding system

Rating

GC G-Bond

2006

Summary

A notable maximum score for ease of use when compared to the pre-evaluation dentine bonding systems was achieved. All 100% of the evaluators would purchase G-Bond.

Rating

Heraeus Kulzer iBond

2004

Summary

55% of the evaluators stated that they would purchase iBond and this indicates the favourable reception of iBond in this competitive area.

Rating

Tokuyama One Up Bond F

2004

Summary

67% of the evaluators stated that they would purchase One Up Bond F.

Rating

Kuraray Clearfil SE Bond

2003

Summary

High scores were achieved throughout the evaluation as well as a higher overall score for ease of use when compared to the panel members' pre-evaluation dentine bonding systems.

Rating

Dentsply Xeno III

2002

Summary

 The majority of the evaluators (67%) would purchase the material if available at average cost.

Rating

ESPE Prompt-L-Pop

2000

Summary

80% of evaluators would purchase the ESPE Prompt-L-Pop bonding system if available at average cost.

Rating