Restorative materials

3M Filtek Universal Restorative

2019

Summary

90% of evaluators would both purchase the material and recommend it to coleagues.

Rating

Voco Ionolux

2017

Summary

70% of the evaluators would purchase this resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material.

Rating

GCP Glass Fill glass carbomer restorative material

2017

Summary

62% of the evaluators would both purchase this material and recommend it to colleagues

Rating

SDI Aura Bulk Fill restorative material

2016

Summary

70% of the evaluators would purchase this bulk fill restorative material and 80% would recommend it to colleagues. 

Rating

Voco Rebilda Post system

2013

Summary

70% of the evaluators would purchase this system and 80% would recommend it to colleagues

Rating

SDI Riva LC resin-modified glass-ionomer

2012

Summary

60% of the evaluators would both purchase this material and recommend it to colleagues

Rating

Shofu Beautifil Flow Plus

2012

Summary

Full paper available on request. Two maximum scores were achieved by this material, which to date is unique for PREP Panel evaluations.

Rating

3M ESPE Protemp 4 Temporary C & B Material

2012

Summary

77% of the evaluators would purchase this material and 85% would recommend it to colleagues. Full published paper available on request

Rating

Dentsply ChemFil Rock

2011

Summary

73% of the evaluators would both purchase this glass-ionomer material and recommend it to colleagues.

Rating

Voco GrandioSo composite restorative

2011

Summary

73% of the evaluators would both purchase this material and recommend it to colleagues

Rating

Dentsply SDR bulk fill restorative material

2010

Summary

75% of the evaluators would both purchase the material and recommend it to colleagues

Rating

3M ESPE Filtek Supreme XTE

2010

Summary

91% of the evaluators would purchase this nano-filled composite restorative material and also recommend it to colleagues

Rating

3M ESPE Clinpro White Varnish

2009

Summary

73% of the evaluators would purchase this material and 100% would recommend it to colleagues

Rating

Tokuyama Palifique Estelite composite restorative

2005

Summary

That 75% of the evaluators would purchase this composite restorative material indicates the positive reception of Palifique Estelite paste by the evaluators.

Rating

Luting

3M RelyX Universal

2021

Summary

Rating

3M ESPE Scotchbond Universal adhesive

2013

Summary

All 100% of the evaluators would purchase this material

Rating

3M ESPE RelyX Ultimate

2011

Summary

83% of the evaluators would purchase the material and 75% would recommend it to colleagues

Rating

Dentsply Calibra Resin composite luting material

2002

Summary

Calibra was rated slightly higher by the evaluators for ease of use compared with their normally used resin-based luting system. The positive reception of the material is shown by all the evaluators stating they would recommend the Calibra system to colleagues.

Rating

Instruments

Dentsply Sirona Nupro White Varnish

2018

Summary

91% of the evaluators would purchase this fluoride varnish system

Rating

Kerr Demi-Ultra Light Curing Unit

2014

Summary

67% of the evalutors would purchase this light-curing unit and 60% would recommend it to colleagues

Rating

3M ESPE Astringent Retraction Paste

2014

Summary

75% of the evaljuators would purchase this capsulated retraction paste system 

Rating

Voco Rebilda Post System

2013

Summary

80% Of the evaluators woiuld purchase this post system

Rating

Ivoclar-Vivadent Optra Matrix

2006

Summary

The OptraMatrix system consists of 6 different thinned matrix bands for use with a Tofflemire matrix retainer. Full publication paper available on request

Rating

Ivoclar-Vivadent OptraContact

2006

Summary

OptraContact is a hand instrument to aid contact point formation in the placing of Class II composite restorations. Full publication paper available on request

Rating

Ivoclar-Vivadent OptraSculpt

2006

Summary

The OptraSculpt instrument & tip system consists of 2 stainless steel/plastic sterilisable instruments for use with 6 different disposable tips to model composite restorative materials before curing. Full publication paper available on request

Rating

Ansell No Powder Examination Gloves

1996

Summary

60% of the evaluators would purchase Ansell No Powder gloves if avalable at £54.00 per box.

Rating

Impressions

3M ESPE Astringent Retraction Paste

2012

Summary

75% of the evaluators would purchase this product and 83% would recommend it to colleagues

Rating

3M ESPE Pentamix 3 Auto-mix Impression machine

2010

Summary

85% of the evaluators would recommend this auto-mix machine to colleagues

Rating

Coltene Affinis Precious

2008

Summary

Evaluation scores were similar to the previously used impression material. Full paper available on request

Rating

3M Position Tray & Penta Quick Preliminary Impression Material

2005

Summary

64% of evaluators would bothe purchase the Position Tray set and the Position Penta Quick impression asystem

Rating

Bonding

GC G-Premio Bond

2019

Summary

The Universal Bonding Agents have been considered to be a step forward in dentine bonding. The excellent reception of GC G-Premio Bond, which was clear from the high scores achieved and the fact that all of the evaluators would purchase the material if available at average cost, would appear to indicate that the bonding agent under evaluation in the current work is ready to join this group.

Rating

3M ESPE Scotchbond Universal

2014

Summary

All 100% of the evaluators would purcahse this bonding system

Rating

Coltene Whaledent One Coat Bond

2007

Summary

45% of the evaluators would purchase this self-etching Bonding system

Rating

Tokuyama One Up Bond F

2004

Summary

67% of the evaluators stated that they would purchase One Up Bond F.

Rating